Cewl I can't read the article though. You know those new fancy digital ID's they're implementing all over the world, like the Rockefeller foundation mention in their future scenario "Lockstep" from 2010?
Don't know if you've looked into it. But you can try any search engine and type any country in the world followed by "new digital ID" and see that all countries are doing this these years while the central banks are working on CBDC.
Here in Denmark they call the new ID for MITID. They say its a voluntary ID because they can't force it on us. I refused and still do. But then the bank closed all my online services to try and coerce my into submission. NETS who control all transactions did the same so I can't spend my own money online anymore. That ofcourse includes subscription fee's and well.. Everything. I can't do any online purchases.
I've already come across 2 stores where I couldn't get in without scanning the QR code for the new nazi-ID.
“I have always classed those as ‘unvaccinated’, when no scar, presumably arising from vaccination, could be discovered.”
Could this situation had any impact on making vaccines such as to cause visible health injury to facilitate classification of the population? Just asking…
What he is actually saying is that even if they had a scar he could register it as unvaccinated if he assumed that the scar was not from vaccination.
What do you mean by that? If that situation had any impact on making vaccines? The medical field and the government used these untrustworthy statistics to keep promoting vaccines.
And also their guidelines didn't really favor the claim of immunity. At the time they revaccinated people after two years and even when vaccinated they told people to get vaccinated again if they came into contact with someone who had smallpox symptoms. So they were constantly poisoned. And the method they used was even worse than now. With a cut on the skin where they smeared dirty pus from animals directly into the blood.
I read a lot of those ancient writings, from many fields. At least those that are available online. My conclusion is that examining the thought process in the 18th and 19th centuries through the knowledge and perception AD 2024 is a wrong approach. If you read contemporary stories about Jenner, you will immediately see that a) he could do whatever he imagined and wanted to, b) his word was the science (sounds familiar?), c) nobody will ask him why his “patients” were injured or died (as it happened with animals), d) the commoners (we) had no day, no idea of legal recourse, and no rights, e) “science” journals or societies of that time were cozy clubs for elites who were not really interested in any science.
This was the time when fantasies like the evolution theory were made up, a concept so ridiculous and contrary to our knowledge - yet it persisted and many “serious” scientists believe in it.
Having a book printed with your name on it was the highest ambition, whether it was rational or reasonable or anything but. And books were printed - for those who could afford to pay. What kind of books were good? The ones people talked about.
We cannot see these books them with the same understanding and respect as we have for post-WW2 publications. We cannot even take them seriously. Compare Malthus’ “An Essay on the Principle of Population”, in which he stated that the population will increase in geometric progression every 25 years - without having any understanding of the process, data to support it, or even awareness that the world was larger than the small settlement he lived in. This fantasy was published in 1798! And it still persists and inspires quite many “respected” adult people these days…
In short, the literature from those times is extremely unreliable. Even the “educated” scientists were so limited and biased beyond our imagination in their thinking. What kind of data could they have? The fastest they could travel was by a horse carriage, say 50 miles per day, complete with nice dinner and local entertainment. A trip from Paris to Lyon (280 mi) could take a week from Bechamp’s life, and a return trip - two to three weeks. Nobody could really care about data reliability or “truth” in statistics under these conditions… We shouldn’t, either.
Good to see people going back through the fraudulent claims of smallpox vaccines.
This link may interest you. It is how London sabotaged an actual cure for Smallpox. https://open.substack.com/pub/charleswright1/p/test-model-proposal-of-sarracenia?r=12gia8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Cewl I can't read the article though. You know those new fancy digital ID's they're implementing all over the world, like the Rockefeller foundation mention in their future scenario "Lockstep" from 2010?
https://ia801700.us.archive.org/20/items/the-annotated-rockefeller-foundation-lockstep-2010/The-Annotated-Rockefeller-Foundation-Lockstep-2010.pdf
Don't know if you've looked into it. But you can try any search engine and type any country in the world followed by "new digital ID" and see that all countries are doing this these years while the central banks are working on CBDC.
Here in Denmark they call the new ID for MITID. They say its a voluntary ID because they can't force it on us. I refused and still do. But then the bank closed all my online services to try and coerce my into submission. NETS who control all transactions did the same so I can't spend my own money online anymore. That ofcourse includes subscription fee's and well.. Everything. I can't do any online purchases.
I've already come across 2 stores where I couldn't get in without scanning the QR code for the new nazi-ID.
The last lines of the last but one image:
“I have always classed those as ‘unvaccinated’, when no scar, presumably arising from vaccination, could be discovered.”
Could this situation had any impact on making vaccines such as to cause visible health injury to facilitate classification of the population? Just asking…
What he is actually saying is that even if they had a scar he could register it as unvaccinated if he assumed that the scar was not from vaccination.
What do you mean by that? If that situation had any impact on making vaccines? The medical field and the government used these untrustworthy statistics to keep promoting vaccines.
And also their guidelines didn't really favor the claim of immunity. At the time they revaccinated people after two years and even when vaccinated they told people to get vaccinated again if they came into contact with someone who had smallpox symptoms. So they were constantly poisoned. And the method they used was even worse than now. With a cut on the skin where they smeared dirty pus from animals directly into the blood.
I read a lot of those ancient writings, from many fields. At least those that are available online. My conclusion is that examining the thought process in the 18th and 19th centuries through the knowledge and perception AD 2024 is a wrong approach. If you read contemporary stories about Jenner, you will immediately see that a) he could do whatever he imagined and wanted to, b) his word was the science (sounds familiar?), c) nobody will ask him why his “patients” were injured or died (as it happened with animals), d) the commoners (we) had no day, no idea of legal recourse, and no rights, e) “science” journals or societies of that time were cozy clubs for elites who were not really interested in any science.
This was the time when fantasies like the evolution theory were made up, a concept so ridiculous and contrary to our knowledge - yet it persisted and many “serious” scientists believe in it.
Having a book printed with your name on it was the highest ambition, whether it was rational or reasonable or anything but. And books were printed - for those who could afford to pay. What kind of books were good? The ones people talked about.
We cannot see these books them with the same understanding and respect as we have for post-WW2 publications. We cannot even take them seriously. Compare Malthus’ “An Essay on the Principle of Population”, in which he stated that the population will increase in geometric progression every 25 years - without having any understanding of the process, data to support it, or even awareness that the world was larger than the small settlement he lived in. This fantasy was published in 1798! And it still persists and inspires quite many “respected” adult people these days…
In short, the literature from those times is extremely unreliable. Even the “educated” scientists were so limited and biased beyond our imagination in their thinking. What kind of data could they have? The fastest they could travel was by a horse carriage, say 50 miles per day, complete with nice dinner and local entertainment. A trip from Paris to Lyon (280 mi) could take a week from Bechamp’s life, and a return trip - two to three weeks. Nobody could really care about data reliability or “truth” in statistics under these conditions… We shouldn’t, either.