From a Lancet report "The Medical Council" from July 1871, we see some of the problems with the claim that the smallpox vaccine prevented smallpox.
Of 9392 patients admitted to the hospital with smallpox symptoms no less than 6854 had been vaccinated.
In Bechamp or Pasteur? : A lost chapter in the history of biology we see some of the same things being shown from a cheif surgeon of the U.S. Army. Very high deathrate from the symptoms among the vaccinated, but for the unvaccinated it did not exceed 3%. So like the rebranding of the name smallpox like I show in the other articles. Measles, chickenpox, monkeypox, syphilis and so on. Almost harmless if you hadn’t been poisoned even more by the doctor or surgeon.
When looking at history but also today with all their indirect testing and false claims to feed the narrative, it is important that we know how they cheat and why we see many different statistics both then and now. It should be easy when all vaccinated people are registered to show all the conditions the unvaccinated have compared to the vaccinated. But there’s no obvious clear statistics in this area. They use germ theory to hide the numbers. Like: It's a bacterial infection, it has nothing to do with the vaccine. But no clear statistics or studies with full transparency.
In 1898 Alfred Russel Wallace exposed how they did statistics in the past and why they are useless. And that it's deliberate because they recorded all vaccinations, even back then. Vaccination A Delusion:
They used these untrustworthy statistics to keep pushing vaccination no matter what.
We also see the same in the news paper archives. Som vaccine and germ-theory pushers make claims about how great vaccination is and how many lives they save while other doctors, surgeons, mothers and fathers tell a completly different story about the devastating effects of vaccination.
As Alfred shows here, some statistics are completely contradictory. How can this be? When there is big money involved and you want to force this on the entire population, it does not take much rational thinking to see and understand how statistics can be so far apart, and why there is no full transparency even though it would be quite easy since all vaccinations are registered. The truth here should be obvious to any logical and rational thinker outthere.
The doctors would just register people with smallpox symptoms as unvaccinated no matter what the patient or thier friends told the doctor. Or if they could not see a scar on the arm, no matter what the patient told them they were registered as unvaccinated.
Even though prominent surgeons said that the scars may wear out over time. And sometimes the symptoms were so severe in patients that the lesions would cover the scar. Listed as unvaccinated to fit the narrative and continue the mass murder.
Good to see people going back through the fraudulent claims of smallpox vaccines.
This link may interest you. It is how London sabotaged an actual cure for Smallpox. https://open.substack.com/pub/charleswright1/p/test-model-proposal-of-sarracenia?r=12gia8&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
The last lines of the last but one image:
“I have always classed those as ‘unvaccinated’, when no scar, presumably arising from vaccination, could be discovered.”
Could this situation had any impact on making vaccines such as to cause visible health injury to facilitate classification of the population? Just asking…