To fully understand why antibiotics can't and won't ever cure anything, it's important to understand the role of bacteria in our bodies.
If you haven’t already I would recommend reading the article “The Role Of The Bacteria” first.
Many people think that antibiotics help... Because they have tried taking it themselves and the symptoms disappeared. Of course, these people have not read up on either the history or the medical studies I'm about to present. Before we go to them, I want to quickly explain why some people think it works.
Everyone knows that if you fall and scratch your knee, our body heals. All by itself. If you make sure to flush the wound so that no contaminants enter the bloodstream, it will also heal faster and you avoid inflammation. It's simple and most people know it. That our body is a self-healing organism.
If you told your child that when they get a wound, they have to eat a rum ball for the wound to heal. You give the child a rum ball every time he or she gets hurt and funnily enough... The wound heals every single time, without exception.
So have you proven that rum balls heal wounds?
Your child thinks so... Just like many adults believe that antibiotics cure certain symptoms/illnesses.
Do you see how it makes sense? The wound would heal without the rum ball, but if the child has been trained to get a rum ball and has seen the wound heal after each time they have gotten the rum ball, they are now 100% convinced that the rum ball is the cause of the wound healing again.
What does PubMed say?
And remember - This is the observations and studies from the medical establishment themselves… The people that believe in the germ-theory of disease, vaccines and medicine!! Thats very important to understand in this article!!!
Antibiotic therapy versus no antibiotic therapy for children aged 2 to 59 months with WHO-defined non-severe pneumonia and wheeze
Overall little to no difference in the antibiotics and no antibiotics group. Little to no difference in clinical cure. The only difference is all the side effects antibiotics can have!
Immediate versus delayed versus no antibiotics for respiratory infections
Again no difference even in pain or clinical symptoms overall!! Except that antibiotics can cause a lot of side effects.
Even though all studies fail to prove that antibiotics make a difference, they write that more research is needed 🤡
The effectiveness of frequent antibiotic use in reducing the risk of infection-related hospital admissions: results from two large population-based cohorts
For people who have generally not taken as many antibiotics in the past, the rate of hospitalizations for infection-related complications decreased faster. So the less antibiotics the less complications 🙂
They also mention this myth about multi-resistant bacteria. But there's no such thing if you understand the role of bacteria. That bacteria develop in the body when we have poisoned tissue to break it down and restore balance in the body. If you kill the bacteria with antibiotics and poison the body again, new bacteria will develop to restore balance once more. Again I’ll refer to my article on the role of the bacteria.
Antibiotics versus no treatment for toxoplasma retinochoroiditis
"Treatment with antibiotics probably reduces the risk of recurrent retinochoroiditis compared with placebo"
Probably... Maybe... Perhaps... MAYBE antibiotics work. Nobody knows :-)
Antibiotics versus no treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria in residents of aged care facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Yes, it's based on asymptomatic bacteria in the urine. It's their indirect tests where they measure proteins that do not prove the cause or whether something is wrong. A scam without equal, but I include it because it's from pubmed, where doctors can go in and get this information themselves and because they believe in all the indirect tests!
But the only difference, of course, was that those on antibiotics experience side effects...
Antibiotics versus no antibiotics in the treatment of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis – a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Here, the group receiving antibiotics has a higher number of complications and also a longer hospital stay than those not receiving antibiotics 🤡
But of course more research is needed Shhh
Keep in mind that your doctor understands the language they use and can go in and read all this stuff themselves if they want to, before they try to throw a prescription in your face 🙂
So antibiotics don't work but luckily they can give you acute liver or kidney problems if you're lucky ❤
Nephrotoxicity of Antimicrobials and Antibiotics
Antibiotic-induced liver toxicity: mechanisms, clinical features and causality assessment
We are all schooled in the rum ball and the fear alone that your body can not heal by itself is enough for people to go to the doctor for more rum balls. Even though that in their own literature they say that theres no to little difference other than more complications and longer hospital stay WITH antibiotics. Thats crazy…
Someone answered my post on facebook on this. A mother who lost her child to ruptured appendix. A tragic story. The problem is that the germ-theory promoters always THINK they know the true cause of symptoms even though it contradicts all experiments and studies.
Here they made study on surgery vs antibiotics for appendicitis.
A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis
A lot of the patients end up getting the surgery anyway. There’s a lot of different stages and intensity of toxicity in the body. And if you don’t look for the true cause or meassure the difference it’s hard to say that all these cases had the same level of toxicity in the body. Some would be able to heal and some wouldn’t. Maybe if they looked for the true cause, all would be able to heal or completly prevent it!
Now if we look at VAERS Data on appendicitis you’ll get so many results that you can’t get the list. So i narrowed the search to include only 1-17 year olds and look at this… The elephant in the room nobody is allowed to talk about:
Great research. Thanks Danni!
Ever since learning germ theory is bs I've been bugged by antibiotics. I was given them a lot as a kid and they seemed to do nothing helpful for things people call respiratory infections and such.
However, I have a close relative with severe dementia. He's too far gone to know what concoction of drugs he's taking on any given day for the myriad of issues he has, so no placebo effect can be at play for a recent experience. He had a wound on his leg that just wouldn't heal on its own, it had been weeks. He was started on antibiotics. It healed almost overnight. I'm not saying abs are a good idea, I don't personally take them, but I don't think they're placebo either (though I acknowledge that will be enhancing perception of their effectiveness). Suppression maybe? Something else? Don't know, but I'm curious.