We all know the official story that bacteria cause disease. Whether you're trained in the pharmaceutical industry or not, this is the theory we've all been fed. Via school, TV, the doctor, universities and the pharmaceutical industry.
So I’ll start with giving you a few informations from chemists and scientists who actually contradict the theory and have been ignored by the industry.
Because if you ignore experiments and evidence that disprove a given hypothesis, then it is no longer science! Then it becomes a belief, a religion. A cult. Especially if you use that belief system to poison people. Both children and adults.
Did the germ-theory start out as a lie? Deception? Well thats kinda hard to prove. But it is provable that it turned into one.
From my article “Smallpox and vaccination. A glimpse of forgotten history.” I show that shortly after they started mass-vaccinating against smallpox two doctors presented over 450 cases of people and also children who had smallpox after vaccination. Many of them fatal. Despite the evidence against the practice The House of Commons and The Jennerian Society continued the project. And we see many scientists, doctors and surgeons telling the same story throughout the 1800s.
In the late 1800s we see the first scientific proof against the germ-theory. Many was already opposed to it but the chemist Antoine Bechamp actually studied and observed fermentation. It was even published in the news papers at the time. He found out that very small microorganisms within the blood under certain conditions would develop into bacteria. He called them microzomes. So bacteria didn’t come from the outside. They didn’t attack living healthy tissue but they are part of the tissue and when it is poisoned, stressed or dead the bacteria will develop to break down the germinal matter. Decompose everything back to its original state. Develop into small spherical bacteria. Then into rods, bigger rods. Then filaments and fungi. So pleomorphism.
In a living organism the stage of the bacteria will depend on how toxic the body and tissue is. When the poisoned tissue is broken down and excreted the bacteria will die of break down into microzomes again. So in a living organism it is the cure. The healing process. The scavengers of the body to clean up the mess. Which we can also observe in all other living things among us. Weather its a roadkill or fruits and vegetables in our home. If its not eaten by other living organisms the tissue will decompose on its own. Symbiosis.
From one of the greatest true biologists of our time today:
”Life is symbiosis on all levels” Dr. Stefan Lanka.
This was posted in Charlstown, Virginia, May 10, 1870
In The Washington Herald, Nov, 6, 1910 it was also published in the news by a doctor how the work of the greatest chemist and biologist at the time was ignored and not obtainable in textbooks. That Bechamp and not Pasteur discovered the causes of many diseases that spread all over France.
Antoine Bechamp was a real scientist. By that I mean that he observed the natural phenomena, was very thorough with his experiments and also observed that there was a certain recipe within the field to create the result they wanted to see. So he had to create new methods of research on his own. He actually describes this in his book The Blood and It’s Third Element:
We see many doctors, surgeons and bacteriologists supporting Bechamps work despite it being so suppressed and today the pharmaceutical industry and the media have convinced people that you are an ignorant conspiracy theorist who spreads dangerous misinformation if you tell the truth. Because that would wipe out the industry almost completely. If people knew that poison causing decomposition in the body was the cause of most symptoms they wouldn’t be able to sell poison as prevention or to treat symptoms anymore. Because thats not how the body of living organisms work.
One of the main things the snake-oil doctors that created big pharma had to reject was the observations and experiments done on spontaneous generation like Bechamp described. That these microzymas developed into bacteria from the germinal matter. Because then they couldn’t claim the bacteria was a dangerous organism coming from outside attacking the host and making you sick. That would ruin the whole idea of vaccination. At the time Bechamps work was published mid-late 1800s they had already been mass vaccinating the public for years and many places with strict vaccination laws. Forcing people to vaccinate themselves and their kids.
Before they could transfer the filthy practice to other claimed diseases (in most cases caused by the vaccinations) they had to reject the idea of spontaneous generation. And they even tell us today. If we look at pubmed under the history of the indirect antibody test:
Another pioneer in bacteriology, Burdon Sanderson also told us that he observed spontanous generation. That the bacteria seemed to spring out of nothing. That the germinal matter seemed almost indestructable because they could poison or heat up the tissue / culture to kill the bacteria, but after a while new bacteria would just form. This is from “Note on Dr. Burdon Sanderson's Latest Views of Ferments and Germs”
Keep in mind that some of these promoted snake-oil doctors like Professor Tyndall who writes these notes. Even though all the experiments rejected the idea of germ-theory they kept promoting it. Said that it had to be germs from the air or contaminated experiments.
Even when calling the other scientists incompetent and then doing the same experiments with the same result Tyndall refused spontaneous generation. So there are no real scientists. Theres only a real hypothesis / theory?
So instead of looking at and observing what was really going on they changed the experiments to fit the theory. Which is pure fraud and pseudoscience. Just like Bechamp actually describes. He observed the fermentation, followed the natural phenomena and had to create new methods to see what was really going on instead of following the snake-oil doctors’ recipe to create a specific result!
Burdon Sanderson also observed the fermentation and that decomposition of tissue precedes the development of bacteria. Decomposing tissue will send of ammonia where the microbes get nitrogen from. So the bacteria can never be the cause. They do not attack healthy tissue. It’s like claiming the chicken is born before the egg is formed. “Chemical Versus Germ Theories of Disease 1875”
And notice Burdon Sanderson proved and Laputa believed so they all went with the belief???
Dr. Thomas Powell swollowed germs for 10 years. Germs that were said to cause some of the most deadly diseases. He laughed at the idea of germ-theory and contagion. “Los Angeles Herald 1897”
Here’s an article from 1913 about the contradictions in germ-theory. They were talking a lot about it at the time. “The Milwaukee Leader, 1913”
The truth can not be variable.
A great body of scientists write about the fraudulent germ-theory. The microbes are just scavengers. The theory is only kept in place to sell vaccines and medicin. It is far more intelligent to believe in witches than that microbes cause disease. It’s a long article where they explain a lot of contradictions in the germ-theory investigated by scientists.
A canadian surgeon also reports on the failed germ-theory in 1916. “The Canada lancet : Vol. 49, no. 10 (June 1916)”
He lists 3 reasons why he challenges the theory:
1) Bacteriologists' differing views on which bacteria cause different symptoms.
2) Stronger evidence for the biochemical theory.
3) Absence of bacteria when disease strikes, of which he gives 3 clear examples;
A) A man was crossing the ice and fell through, got scratched, started getting sick and the doctor feared pneumonia. Tested the patient for pneumococcus, but the bacteria was not present. Only after the symptoms worsened was the bacteria found.
B) After an oyster dinner, some men developed stomach cramps and diarrhoea, followed by typhoid fever. No Eberth Bacilli (renamed Salmonella typhi today) were found. Only later in the process could they find the bacteria.
C) A woman rushed to her shop, so she had started to sweat. It was cold in the shop, so she started to freeze. The next day she complained of a sore throat. No Klebs Löffler bacteria (today renamed Corynebacterium diphtheriae) was found. After the symptoms got worse, they were able to find the bacteria.
This is why they today only use indirect means to diagnose. Because the germ-theory is disproven. So they know the bacteria is not always there so they look for proteins. So they look for molecules that they know are present in all life. In all tissue. So when the tissue breaks down, you’ll be able to measure higher amounts of proteins. But that doesn’t prove the cause. And remember we already have proof that docomposition of tissue precedes the development of bacteria. So what causes the tissue to break down in living orgnisms?
So indirect tests and then they created another imaginary term called “immunity” / “immune-system”. But that term is solely related to the germ-theory. Because you can not become immune to anything ells. Not car crashes. Not drinking gasoline. Not jumping from a 14 story building. Immune-system is nothing without the germ-theory. And the indirect testing can only tell you that you might have tissue decomposing in your body.
So it’s like saying:
1. You are diagnosed with tuberculosis and you have a nose. So the nose is the cause.
If you have a nose and don’t have any symptoms you’re asymptomatic or a latent carrier.
If you were in an accident and lost your nose and get symptoms similar to tuberculosis they would say your immune system is broken or an imaginary virus.
It’s completly nonsense! Pseudoscience! Fraud! One imaginary term does not prove an imaginary disproven theory!
Lets look at some of the experiments done by other bacteriologists in the past. Theres no real experiments done on bacteria today because it would disprove the whole theory. So they only use indirect methods looking for proteins or even further away from reality by using computer software and genetics. So creating a virtual non-provable reality to keep poisoning children with vaccines. And because all real experiments done in the past have failed as I already showed.
Bacteria, by George M. Sternberg 1885 is a great collection of experiments done by different bacteriologists at the time. We’ll go through some of them here but like always I’d recommend reading the book.
So when it comes to anthrax intravenous injections and virus here meaning poisonous substance / poisonous fluid as this is way before the fictional field virology only produced slight indisposition for a few days and inoculation into the muscles with the bacterium didn’t even produce the tumors. And keep in mind that in ALL their experiments they have to inject rotten decomposed material into animals to produce symptoms. They can not inject one, put it in a cage with 20 others and show that the others come down with the same symptoms. So in no case can they expose anyone to isolated purified bacteria to produce symptoms and in no case can they prove contagion. Just like Bechamp describe “precise design to a determined end”. It’s like a recipe and most of them fail anyway!
So they can inject decomposed rotten material into animals and kill them but the bacteria injected alone does no harm. So these experiments only prove Bechamp, Sanderson and others correct and directly disproves the germ-theory. Which is why experiments like these are not done anymore.
Everything is indirect methods and computer algorithms today to keep injecting innocent healthy children with dead tissue, toxic metals and chemicals. Things that can produce illness but never prevent it.
Injecting poison causes local necrosis. Well hello? Is anybody home? Ofcourse it does. It is things injected that should not even be inside a living organism. You shouldn't eat it, let alone inject it into your body. That will poison the tissue, cause decomposition and then bacteria will develop to clean up the mess. But they still point to the bacteria as the cause of the problem.
And here we see the problem the canadian surgeon writes about as above. That the same stage of bacilli is found in the mouth of patients suffering from other so-called diseases. Because dis-ease is a condition. Not specific entities but different stages of the same condition and the stage of the bacteria will depend on how poisoned the tissue is of the patient. Was the patient vaccinated recently. Is the patient taking any toxic drugs/medication? Drinking poisoned water? Working in the field spraying pesticides? Was the patient exposed to extreme cold. All these things that can poison and damage the tissue of a living human being! All these things are never taken into consideration when they do the experiments and they always have to inject / contaminate / poison the animals to produce symptoms.
Remember where the word contagion originated
So they are fumbling around in the different stages of bacteria because of their unscientific belief in germ-theory.
It’s like these people didn’t read the work of Bechamp because that explains it. Like the good doctor wrote in one of the articles above. It wasn’t in the textbooks. The science and experiments that would give the simple answer to all these experiments without any discrepancies!
A child dies from hydrophobia and 4 hours later they take some dead material from the child and inject it into rabbits. This is just torture and it doesn’t prove anything other that you shouldn’t inject decomposed / poisoned material into living organisms. And think about it. At the time they had strict vaccination laws some places. They fail to mention this but they just did the same to the poor child. Cut the skin of the innocent child and smeared rotten material from a cow into the blood of the innocent child and it died from hydrophobia! But noone sees this? It is insanity!
And you can inject any rotten germinal matter into animals to produce what they call tuberculosis. Like here. Again they’ll bring up Koch and say there must have been some spores in the air or the material contaminated with the claimed bacteria. To cover up these discrepancies. So all other scientists are just incompetent. Only the frauds promoting germ-theory are correct. So they can keep vaccinating and selling chemicals to suppress symptoms.
Vaccination is the most vicious weapon ever brought upon humanity. Today, in many places, the state steals money from the population. Then buys vaccines to make its own citizens sick and kill them. They take your blood, sweat and tears and use it to make you and your children sick. Through years of propaganda or suppression of the right information, they have made the population accept this. This must be the definition of the devil's work
Outta fucken sight! An out-of-the-park homerun! And a perfect ending with that newspaper clipping talking about "vaccine virus" (poisoned jabs).
Have you sent this to the Bailey's and Cowan? I am disappointed they have yet to produce such an article or video. They've come sort of close, but not as plain & thorough as you have done here.
Well done.
Dare I wonder if you'll do a deep dive into antibiotics? How long do they stay in the body? How does the body break them down? Do they spread throughout the entire body? Are there any that go directly to a site in the body, or do they all "infect" the entire body?
I have been vehemently opposed to ANY use of antibiotics since I learned that bacteria are GOOD and not predators or parasites, but I have lately revised my opinion based on experience with my cats. I now employ antibiotics for EMERGENCY USE ONLY -- and with that, the lowest dose possible for the shortest amount of time.
I've learned as a philosopher that one must always set aside some wiggle room and not get trapped into the slavery of principle. One must be able to bend with the wind...
In short, one cat had a progressively nasty cough for about 2 years and it was just getting worse & worse. It broke my heart each time I would witness his deep coughing fits, but I thought sure his Vital Force & body knew what was going on and was gonna take care of business and the cough would go away on its own -- but it did not.
My other cat was terribly snotty & sneezy for more than 6 months...it was getting so bad that she couldn't eat without sneezing after each bite. Her breath smelled like ammonia. Her eyes and face were looking mucky. Again, I thought sure it would clear up on its own, but no. It didn't. It was just getting progressively worse.
We vacuumed & dusted and cleaned the beddings...We tried to get them to eat healthier food...
Our other cat has not had any snottiness or coughing.
And then my wife ordered some antibiotics for herself, told them exactly what type she needed and what type she did NOT want, and naturally they sent what she did NOT want -- but, they were the type that vets use for cats with snotty noses & coughs. I'm a follow-the-signs kind of guy and it looked to me like the cats had predetermined the arrival of these particular antibiotics -- what a co-inky-dink that they should arrive against my principle...
We've been dosing the 2 cats for a couple of weeks -- snotty nose all cleared up, no more sneezing, no more mucky face, poo still looks healthy -- and my other cat's cough has stopped.
Being cautious, we stopped dosing when the sneezing & cough stopped, and then 2 days later, both started up again. We're back on the doses and the cough has stopped and there is no more sneezing. We'll see how things go. That's all we can do.
And yes, I've researched so-called natural alternatives but have not been impressed or convinced by their efficacy.
After nearly 4 years of intense, continuous research, I have concluded, firmly, with no lingering doubts, that when it comes to health, illness, and medicines, it has ALWAYS, throughout history, been nothing more than a guess and a gamble.
Thanks Danni, I have been reading Bechamp's book but couldn't place his conclusions in todays language and you have solved that problem. So, what are things like eColi and Salmonella?