Tuberculosis

An Exposure Of The Fallacy Of Inoculation As A Cure For The Disease

This article is from 1894 just a few years after they started using the Koch’s Lymph / Tuberculine.

They wanted to start using the Koch’s Lymph on farm animals. Increase their income by applying the practice to cattle. But like the article says. Wouldn’t you look at the history of its use on humans before applying it to animals aswell? Seems pretty logical.

Again like any other inoculation / vaccination ever manufactured the fearfull are easily seduced by the people who claim to have a cure. Because they have been misguided their whole life in how disease builds up in a living organism. That it is mostly poisons in our environment and system and not the germs. Poisons in the tissue will start decomposition of the tissue. Bacteria will develop from the microzymas in our body as scavengers. Like Burdon Sanderson said “Decomposition of tissue precedes the development of bacteria”.

They places diseased matter.. Not isolated bacteria but decomposed tissue / rot… That will create symptoms and so called disease. Not the germs. We are told that the use of it was forbidden in Germany. They could only experiment on people in hospitals. Crazy.

They killed patients in Berlin by the hundreds.

Professor Virchow proved through many autopsies that the Koch’s Lymph / the cure, was making the tissue even worse and spread the poisoning to the whole body. And now they wanted to try on cattle aswell.

I’ll just quote from the article here:

”It may be considered presumptions for laymen to question the practices of professionals, but common sense will hold its own any day against what is now called “scientific research” If there was ever a fraud that deserved exposure, it is the inoculation infatuation from Pasteur’s spurious hydrophobia preventive, Brown Sequard’s elixir of life, Koch’s Lymph, diptheria antitoxin, to Jenner’s protective vaccination against smallpox. Physicians are waking up to the alarming spread of inoculable diseases like cancer, etc. laying it to the general and compulsory prevalence of vaccinations and it may be the day will sometime come when neither man nor beast will be sacrifices by empirics who have found it so easy to play on the credulity of human nature.”

This article was just the announcment. But around those years we also see a lot of deaths from the magic cure. From Great Falls Montana, 1891 we see the first two patients in the county. One dead and the other one dying. Let’s call it a cure?

Damage control in the media… Is it a kill or a cure. Many deaths to be balanced. Exept for the fact that most of these symptoms they claim to be from germs originate from other inoculations/vaccinations! And a few more victims.

Cases like this poor young girl from 1914. She was completly blinded AND diagnosed with tuberculosis after vaccination! You need to keep that in mind to understand the insanity of the idea of vaccination. They called her condition worse than dead!

Vaccinated british soldiers diagnosed with tuberculosis.

Most people ignore these very obvious and important factors when looking at the fraudulent germ-theory and the idea of vaccination.

Prof. Virchow mentioned in the first article. Rudolph Virchow was a highly recognized scientist worldwide and spoke against the germ theory. He was celebrated in many countries.

But a few years after his death, even though he was celebrated as someone who gave a lot to medical knowledge and was against the germ theory and vaccination, they suddenly knew many scientists of higher standing.

”If he could live his life over again, he would devote it to proving that the “germ-theory” was wrong and that the germ sought its natural habitat - diseased tissue - rather than causing the tissue to become diseased”.

Its amazing that they never really thought about examining the true effects/defects from vaccination. All vaccinations are registered. Full transparency for all humans. What kind of conditions do the vaccinated have compared to the unvaccinated and did all the unvaccinated die because of the germ theory? :-) It’s simple and really obvious why they don’t do that.

Especially when we know that a review of Robert Koch’s "The etiology of

tuberculosis" actually tells us that he never proved that the presumed germ was the cause of human tuberculosis.

And they also knew that it wasn’t contagious

From Santa Fe New Mexican, 1902 “A Fear Without Foundation”

In the first place many eminent physicians have contended that the contagiousness or infectiousness of consumption is unsupported by evidence.

Bromton hospital for consumptives, London during a period of 36 years, not a case of consumption occurred among its 36 physicians, 150 clinical assistants and 101 nurses.

So they don’t know what causes tuberculosis. They know that it is not contagious. And yet it never occurred to them that it could be vaccinations causing tuberculosis symptoms too? Especially the smallpox vaccine that people got repeatedly. In many places they had to be revaccinated every 2 years and if they came into contact with someone who had smallpox they had to be vaccinated again. That in itself doesn't even fit into their story about immunity either.