Cauterize them to death and blame the dog!

Hydrophobia / Rabies

In the past they always cauterized deep cuts and wounds. As explained in some of the other articles we have also seen how they “disinfected” the ill and wounded. Using toxic minerals and metals like mercury, antimony and arsenic.

Like today in the medical field they always ignore how they treat the patient. The sample. The culture. Because observing the obvious would ruin the whole medical field and the Germ-Theory delusion.

Like this article about the Fraud Pasteurs miracle wonder against so called rabies.

Pasteur on Rabies, 1889

They always have to exaggerate to create fear and increase the desire to buy their miracle cure as soon as you get a little scratch. So usually 20 out of 20 people bitten by a dog die. The 3 that died had serious injuries. .... But the 16 that survived we don't hear much about. Was it just a small scratch on the arm? Did they lose a lot of blood? Were they near death, since they claim Pasteur saved their lives?

Further down in the article we see a “terrible list”. Well… It is terrible, but not the way they put it.

Bite wounds is physical damage which can also damage nerves. If the nerves or brain are damaged or poisoned one way or the other they can call it a lot of different things. But it is just different stages of the same condition. Paralysis, meningitis, tetanus, epilepsy, hydrophobia, rabies and so on.

Now if you look at the list here. They’ll just give us a few details. But most of the people who died were cauterized. That procedure is where they burn the wound to stop the bleeding. But remember at the time they used these poisonous substances. So if you rub mercury into the blood and cauterize the wound… Now your body is unable to get rid of the mercury and if flows around in your bloodstream. Goes to your liver, heart, brain and/or nervous system. And the claimed cause will always be the dog/wolf :-) Not the treatment. Do you see the insanity in these cases? The absurdity of their stories when they want to sell a cure?

Because we also see the true stories of the practice next to articles like the one above.

A surgical operation. Romoving a fungus growth from the subspinal cord. Formed from cauterization with mercury :-) Why don’t they mention this in the article above praising Pasteur's “cure”? Ignoring the obvious. Like always right?

What about this article from 1894 about a little boy and girl bitten by a cat. The treatment alone can kill anyone. Cauterizing and mercury. They don’t give us information on what treatment he gave the boy. Just that it wasn’t the same as the girl. But any deep cut or wound can be fatal. Loss of blood. Physical damage. Poisons that get into the blood. And remember - This is still around the time where they told people to drink antimony with lemonade to cure fevers ;-)

Cauterize with “butter of antimony”. They make is sound so sweet dont they :-) And when you get symptoms it’s always a germ?

And arsenic. This was just to show that they used all 3 of these toxic substances on people and animals but they rarely looked at the treatment as the cause of symptoms. Not much have changed in 130 years.